Upcoming Webinars
Access the latest trends and insights shaping the profession—free for members.
.png)
 (1).jpg)
_1.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Document
RFP -Compensation Study, 2023
Year Created: 2023
DOCUMENT
RFP - Finalists Oral Presentation 1996
- YEAR CREATED: 1996
- TYPE OF DOCUMENT: RFP - Request for Proposals
- Management
- Professional Services
The document is an attachment to a letter related to a project proposal for the City. The document outlines the information and requirements that the City is seeking from potential contractors or subcontractors.
The document includes several sections, including the project schedule, proposed budget, identification of similar projects, references, and samples of work products. The project schedule should indicate whether the proposed schedule is reasonable and achievable, and if a different schedule would produce a better product. The proposed budget should include estimated hours for each team member and is a non-binding cost estimate at this stage. The identification of similar projects and references for those projects are also requested. Additionally, the document asks for samples of work products generated for similar assignments by the primary individuals who will be assigned to the project.
The document also mentions that during the initial review of the responses to the original solicitation, some questions were generated by the review committee. The respondents are asked to answer these questions fully in their response. However, the questions themselves are not provided in the document.
The evaluation criteria for the project submissions are mentioned, including the extent to which the offeror meets the requirements of the RFP and their ability to accomplish the work. The experience of the staff assigned to the project and their past experience in completing projects on time and within budget will also be evaluated.
The document provides some notes for the oral presentation, including the time available for the presentation and questions, and the fact that the final ranking may not be decided on the date of the oral presentation. It also mentions that the City is looking for the best-qualified firm or firms, not necessarily the best price at this stage.
Finally, a tentative project schedule is provided, including the committee review and comment, oral presentations, contract award, work commencement, and preliminary report to staff.