DOCUMENT

Policies - Procurement Manual 2007

  • YEAR CREATED: 2007
  • ENTITY TYPE: County
  • TYPE OF DOCUMENT: POL - Policies/Procedures
This document outlines the requirements and criteria for submitting a proposal for a transportation infrastructure project. It includes information on anticipated public and government support or opposition, as well as strategies for involving and informing the general public, business community, and local governments. The document also emphasizes the compatibility of the project with local economic development efforts, comprehensive plans, and infrastructure development plans. Additionally, it provides a list of required submissions at the detailed stage, such as topographical maps, plans for securing necessary property, and conceptual site plans. The document also highlights the need for a detailed description of the proposed participation and financial involvement of the county, as well as guarantees and warranties provided by firms involved in the project. It further requires a life-cycle cost analysis, assumptions about user fees or rates, and identification of any known government or public support or opposition for the project. The document also mentions the need for consistency with local comprehensive or infrastructure development plans and the impact of the proposed project on the county's development plans. Other requirements include an ongoing performance evaluation system, identification of conflicts of interest, and compliance with ethics in public contracting. The document concludes by mentioning that the evaluation and selection criteria for proposals may be modified to meet the needs of the project and the department. It also includes criteria related to the qualifications and experience of the proposed team, past performance, ability to perform the work, and leadership structure. In addition to the above, the document also includes a question regarding the lead firm on the project. It asks if one firm has been designated as the lead and which firm is proposed to be the developer. This suggests that the document is seeking clarification on the roles and responsibilities of the firms involved in the project.
MEMBERS ONLY DOWNLOAD
Advertisement

Similar Documents

Document
Evaluation Committee Rules of Conduct
Year Created: 2025
Document
ART - Administartive Overview - Major Contracting Solicitation Methods 2004
Year Created: 2004
Document
ART - Administrative Regulations, 2008
Year Created: 2008