Upcoming Webinars
Access the latest trends and insights shaping the profession—free for members.
.png)
 (1).jpg)
_1.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Document
RFP - Consultant Services for Transit Planning, Analysis and Public Engagement
Year Created: 2024
DOCUMENT
RFP - Farm Museum Operation 2005
- YEAR CREATED: 2005
- ENTITY TYPE: County
- TYPE OF DOCUMENT: RFP - Request for Proposals
- Parks and Recreation
The document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by Howard County, Maryland. The RFP is numbered 17-05 and includes various sections outlining the requirements and evaluation criteria for potential proposers.
The document emphasizes the need for proposers to demonstrate their understanding of the conditions, work, and materials involved in the proposed services. It also requires proposers to provide their credentials, including work history and background, as well as specific experience in farming or farm equipment programming in a public land context.
The RFP also requests information about any subcontractors involved, including their qualifications. It requires proposers to provide the names, titles, addresses, telephone numbers, and qualifications of key personnel involved in the project. Additionally, proposers are expected to submit their financial statements and a detailed summary of their proposed use of the leased property, including a conceptual plan.
The document also specifies that proposers should provide a task-by-task breakdown and timeline, with cost estimates for each phase of the proposed work. They are required to describe their Safety and Health Plan and any value-added services or monetary considerations they can offer to the county.
The evaluation of proposals will be based on several criteria, including the proposed use of the leased property, the qualifications of key individuals, the response to the Safety and Health Program, the documented understanding of the work, and the price. The most qualified proposers may be required to make individual presentations to the evaluation committee, and negotiations may take place before the final award is made.
The document also includes sections on indemnification, stating that the proposer will be responsible for any damage to life and property resulting from their activities. The proposer is required to indemnify and hold harmless the county against any losses, except in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct by the county. The proposer is also responsible for the risk associated with improvements to the leased property and is required to hold the county harmless from liability for any injuries to their employees or subcontractors. The proposer accepts the leased property "as is" and is responsible for any defect or environmental condition in or about the Leased Property or other use of the Leased Property.
Overall, the document provides detailed instructions and requirements for potential proposers, as well as the evaluation criteria and indemnification provisions.