DOCUMENT

RFP - Actuarial Services 2006

  • YEAR CREATED: 2006
  • ENTITY TYPE: City/Township
  • TYPE OF DOCUMENT: RFP - Request for Proposals
The document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the City of Salt Lake City. The document outlines the requirements and instructions for potential service and product providers to submit proposals for a contract. The document includes various sections and instructions for the proposal submission process. It emphasizes the City's interest in environmental matters and asks potential providers to list measures they have taken to minimize adverse impacts on the environment, such as the use of alternative fuel vehicles, recycling measures, and energy reduction measures. The City also encourages offerors to accept electronic payments and asks for information regarding their ability to accept electronic payments and any policies or discounts they offer for such payments. The document includes a section on City Ethics Requirement, where offerors are required to represent that they have not provided illegal gifts or payoffs to City officers or employees, and that they have not knowingly breached any ethical standards set forth in the City's conflict of interest ordinance. The City also emphasizes its policy that City employees are prohibited from accepting gifts, incentives, and promotional items from suppliers, and suppliers are not allowed to offer such items to City employees. The document further mentions the City's value-based procurement approach, where certain criteria related to non-discrimination policies, apprenticeships, drug-testing programs, and local presence are considered in the evaluation of proposals. The document also provides information on the award process, preparation of proposals, discussions with offerors, equal opportunity, and proposal ownership. It states that all proposals become the property of the City and may not be returned to the offeror. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive any informality or technical defect in proposals received. Additionally, offerors may be required to submit additional documentation or information if they are deemed irresponsible or unreliable by the Purchasing, Contracts & Property Management Division.
MEMBERS ONLY DOWNLOAD
Advertisement

Similar Documents