Upcoming Webinars
Access the latest trends and insights shaping the profession—free for members.
.png)
 (1).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Document
RFP -Compensation Study, 2023
Year Created: 2023
DOCUMENT
RFP - Insurance Broker of Record Services 2009
- YEAR CREATED: 2009
- ENTITY TYPE: State
- TYPE OF DOCUMENT: RFP - Request for Proposals
- Management
- Professional Services
The document is an evaluation summary for a Request for Proposal (RFP). The document provides an overview of the evaluation criteria and scoring system used to assess the proposals received.
The evaluation is divided into two sections: Technical Evaluation and Cost Evaluation.
In the Technical Evaluation section, the document outlines four criteria: Understanding of the Project, Methodology Used for the Project, Quality and Completeness of Proposal, and Experience and Qualifications. Each criterion is assigned a maximum point value, and evaluators are instructed to provide a score for each criterion based on the proposals received. The total score for the Technical Evaluation is calculated by summing up the individual scores for each criterion.
The Cost Evaluation section explains how the cost proposals will be evaluated. It mentions the application of North Dakota preference laws and reciprocal preference for nonresident offerors. The lowest average commission will receive the maximum points allocated for cost, and the points awarded to other proposals will be determined based on the ratio of their average commission to the lowest average commission.
The document also includes a summary table for the evaluation totals, showing the maximum points available for each criterion and the scores given to each vendor for each criterion. The Technical Proposal Score is calculated by dividing the total points awarded in the Technical Evaluation by the maximum points available. The Cost Proposal Score is a separate score out of 10 points. The document concludes with a grand total, which is the sum of all individual scores.