The document discusses the use of time and material contracts in government acquisitions and suggests that contracting officers should consider alternative contract types, such as firm fixed price contracts. The author shares their approach of releasing a draft or current contract's statement of work and soliciting feedback from interested firms to make specific changes. They ask for input on what information should be provided to potential contractors to permit a firm fixed price arrangement and why a firm may believe it is too risky. The author emphasizes the importance of leveraging industry feedback to develop improved solicitations and contracts. They argue that more legislation or regulation to prohibit the use of time and material contracts is not necessary, as current guidance and good business judgment are sufficient. The author also mentions recent FAR changes allowing time and material contracts for commercial item contracts and the importance of considering the long-term best interests of clients and responsible use of public funds. The document includes references to relevant sources.